On 31 January 2014, an arbitral tribunal consisting of arbitrators José-Miguel Júdice, President, Manuel Conthe and Raúl Vinuesa, found Bolivia liable under the UK-Bolivia bilateral investment treaty for the unlawful expropriation of the 50 per cent stake owned by Rurelec, a UK power investor, in the Bolivian electricity generation company Empresa Eléctrica Guaracachi SA (“EGSA”). According to Rurelec, it is the first known investment treaty case against the state to reach a final award. Continue reading
As already reported, on 18 February 2013 the Government of the Plurinational State of Bolivia agreed to expropriate and nationalize Servicios de Aeropuertos Bolivianos, S.A. (SABSA), a Bolivian company which was granted concessions to run airports in La Paz, Santa Cruz de la Sierra and Cochabamba. SABSA was ultimately controlled by Spanish companies Abertis and AENA from 2004 until the date of nationalization. Continue reading
We would like to highlight that two oil and gas companies that sued Argentina at ICSID have announced new, multi-million investments in the country.
The Government of the Plurinational State of Bolivia has agreed to expropriate and nationalize Servicios de Aeropuertos Bolivianos, S.A. (SABSA), a Bolivian company which was granted concessions to run airports in La Paz, Santa Cruz de la Sierra and Cochabamba. SABSA was until the date of expropriation under control of two Spanish companies, Abertis (90%) and AENA (10%), through holding company TBI. Continue reading
Amid rumours of Argentina’s upcoming denunciation of the ICSID Convention after many awards and decisions rendered against that country, it is advisable to reflect about the current status of the Maffezini doctrine within its original context, i.e., the Spain-Argentina (or, reciprocally, the Argentina-Spain) BIT.
So far, six Arbitral Tribunals have accepted that investors (whether Argentinean or Spanish) may benefit from the MFN Clause included in Article IV(2) of the BIT to bypass a required 18-month period of litigation within the host State courts before resorting to international arbitration (ICSID or ad hoc under the UNCITRAL Rules of Arbitration). As far as it is known, to date no Arbitral Tribunal under the Spain-Argentina BIT has denied this solution, although a dissenting opinion was rendered for the first time in late December 2012.
The current score is, as indicated above, 6-0, a clear victory for investors against host States. It could lead us to affirm the existence of jurisprudence constante in this legal issue, at least under the Spain-Argentina BIT. Nonetheless, this post intends only to update the reader on this topic and is deliberately open for further research, analysis and debate. Continue reading
Following our post dated 4 January 2013, the online edition of the official journal of the Plurinational State of Bolivia has published the text of Supreme Decree No. 1448 whereby the Government of Bolivia expropriated shares in four Bolivian companies owned by Spanish energy company Iberdrola through its Bolivian subsidiary Iberbolivia de Inversiones.
Just before the end of last year, on 29 December 2012, President Evo Morales of Bolivia signed Supreme Decree No. 1448 whereby the Government of Bolivia took control of four private-owned electricity companies:
- Electricidad de La Paz (Electropaz);
- Empresa de Luz y Fuerza Eléctrica de Oruro, Sociedad Anónima (ELFEO);
- Compañía Administradora de Empresas Bolivia, Sociedad Anónima (CADEB); and,
- Empresa de Servicios, Sociedad Anónima (EDESER).
Majority stakes thereof belonged at the time of the expropriations to Iberbolivia de Inversiones, Sociedad Anónima, a company subsidiary of Spanish energy company Iberdrola:
- Electropaz: 89.05%;
- ELFEO: 92.84%;
- CADEB: 93.49%; and,
- EDESER: 89.39%.